Q4 Settings
Corporate Profile
Investor Relations
News & Events
Press Releases
Presentations
Webcasts
Event Calendar
Event Calendar
Presentations
Five Star Bank Community Report
Stock Info
Stock Quote
Dividends
Total Return Calculator
Historic Prices
Insider Transactions
Ownership
Covering Analysts
Financials
Annual Reports
SEC Filings
As Reported Financial Statements
Financial Highlights
Insider Filings
D/L Composition
Peer Analysis
M & A
Details
Governance
Officers & Directors
Governance Documents
Governance Committees
Shareholders
Information Request
Email Notification
FAQ
Return to Five Star Bank
Toggle navigation
Menu
Five Star Bank
Close Menu
Looking for something? We'll help you.
Five Star Bank
Close Login
Looking for something?
Search
Entire IR Site
Documents
Press Releases
Ownership
Ownership > 100%
Copyright
,
© Powered By Q4 Inc.
Ownership > 100%
List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:
Double-counting
- On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.
Short Interest
- A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.
A gap between 'as of' dates
- In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.
Other possible reasons:
a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions;
b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues;
c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.